Slipr

Icon

the reporter's notebook of Christopher Mims

neologism: Intergenerational Justice

Intergenerational Justice

Discovered in the context of the debate over doing something about climate change later rather than sooner. Incredibly, the intersection of intergenerational justice and climate policy is an active field of study unto itself:

Archive for the ‘Distributive and Intergenerational Justice’ Category at ClimateEthics.org

Filed under: climate change

MLK Jr.

We are now faced with the fact that tomorrow is today. We are confronted with the fierce urgency of now. In this unfolding conundrum of life and history there is such a thing as being too late. Procrastination is still the thief of time…. We may cry out desperately for time to pause in her passage, but time is deaf to every plea and rushes on. Over the bleached bones and jumbled residue of numerous civilizations are written the pathetic words: “Too late.”

via

Filed under: climate change,

Archive of past articles

Blurbs on Lester Brown, RecycleBank and charity: water for Good magazine
Good

Crocodile-like Reptiles Lived in the Arctic 55 Million Years Ago. Could it Happen Again?
Popular Science

Mining “Ice That Burns”
Technology Review

The World’s 10 Largest Renewable Energy Projects
Scientific American

Wild Boars Menace Germany. Could it Happen Here?
Popular Science

‘Ecological Intelligence’ and The Google of Green Shopping
Green Living

Sending Cell Phones into the Cloud
Technology Review

Hackers Weigh In: 8 Big Things to Do with a Mini Server
Scientific American

Netbook Chips Create a Low-Power Cloud
Technology Review

Hybrid Trucks Are Here for the Long (Medium and Short) Haul
Scientific American

‘Gay Elephant’ Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg
Popular Science

Exoskeletons Give New Life to Legs
Scientific American

Plan Bee: As Honeybees Die Out, Will Other Species Take Their Place?
Scientific American

The $9000 Plug-in Hybrid That Will Beat the Volt to Market
Popular Science

Stingless Bees Mummify Enemies
Scientific American

“The Most Beautiful Moment in Science” – Captured on Film
Popular Science

Can Geothermal Power Compete with Coal on Price?
Scientific American

Are e-books an environmental choice?
Green Living

Electric Shocks to the Face, Then and Now (video)
Popular Science

Can Geothermal Power in Iceland Thaw a Frozen Economy?
Scientific American

5 Not-So-Green Gadgets
Green Living

What Is The Worst Possible Disaster That Could Befall Earth?
Popular Science

Why Artificial Intelligence Threatens Actual Intelligence (video)
Popular Science

Threat Watch, LHC? (video)
Popular Science

One Hot Island: Iceland’s Renewable Geothermal Power
Scientific American

Filed under: biotech, change.org, climate change, Green Living, green technology, information technology, Popular Science, Scientific American, Technology Review, Wired

When syndication goes horribly awry

nro.jpg

Jeff Jarvis may be all about “do what you do best and link to the rest,” but if he were actually, you know, working for an online news organization he’d know that the real traffic building these days is in “do what you do best and syndicate the rest.”

Except that sometimes that goes horribly awry, as in CBS’s decision to start syndicating content from National Review, thus turning the website of the most-watched television network into a bullhorn for climate change deniers.

Filed under: climate change, , , , , , , , , , , ,

This is why we’re not going to do anything about climate change before it’s too late

Chinese official urges practical action to slow down climate change

While working on a long-term target for slowing down the climate change, all countries involved should be aware that the formulating process itself must be scientific, environmentally valid, economically feasible and fair, he said, adding that historical accumulation, per capital emissions and the development demand of the developing countries should also be weighed as well.

Except, what if, because reasonable projections tell us that we must peak our carbon emissions in just seven years — by 2015 — and drastically reduce them thereafter, while at the same time the IEA projects that world energy demand will increase by 50% by 2030, the situation is dire enough that no plausible solution is going to be anything other than economically painful, messy, and probably horribly unfair? And even a little bit, as we scramble to try everything, unscientific?

Safe money says the 200-odd sovereign nations of this planet, who can hardly agree not to destroy each other in fruitless wars, are going to have a hard time all signing on to radical changes to their economy and infrastructure in service of not hitting those carbon cycle feedback tipping points.

Filed under: climate change,

Twitter

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.